Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 JTD

180 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,445 kg
    3,186 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,238 km
    769 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
1,445kg3,186lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
69.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
60.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,205km749mi
Calculated
1,238km769mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
52L
CO2 emissions-
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T44,700 rpm1,300-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
25.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,445 kg
3,186 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T47.2 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD6.8 s

Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,205 km
749 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,238 km
769 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW
6.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.2 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
1,205 km
749 mi
1,238 km
769 mi
CO2 score
-
109 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km7.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi11.83 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal630 L166 US gal139 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,103 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T4
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.2 JTD
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.2 JTD
C 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.2 JTD
2.0d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 T4
2.2 JTD
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
2.2 JTD
2.0 T4
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
2.2 JTD
2.0d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.2 JTD
E 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD - car comparison - FastVsFaster