Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,238km769mi Calculated | 1,535km954mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 180 hp 134 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,238 km 769 mi | 1,535 km 954 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 297 km (184 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























