Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 JTD

180 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,445 kg
    3,186 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,535 km
    954 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,445kg3,186lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight-
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
60.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
25.8s
Calculated
31.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,238km769mi
Calculated
1,535km954mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance-
116mm5in
Trunk volume
480L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
52L
66L
CO2 emissions
109g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.8 s
31.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD6.8 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,238 km
769 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,535 km
954 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
180 hp
134 kW
6.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
6.8 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,238 km
769 mi
1,535 km
954 mi
CO2 score
109 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.35 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.83 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used630 L166 US gal139 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,103 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 297 km (184 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster