Alfa Romeo Brera
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6vsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 29.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,341mm53in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,528mm100in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 29.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has 22 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 7.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 636 km 395 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 8 Nm more
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























