Volvo C30
Car comparison
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5vsAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
2.4 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range1,029 km640 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,437 kg3,168 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,437kg3,168lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 96.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 1,029km640mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,387cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,252mm167in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,548mm61in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 660 km 410 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 1,029 km 640 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.9 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 1,029 km 640 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 | Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 138 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 370 km (230 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























