AUDI TT Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,260kg2,778lb | 1,437kg3,168lb |
| Gross weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,352mm53in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has 20 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 7.1 s |
Although Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 57 L more trunk volume
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























