Volvo C30
Car comparison
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5vsVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010
2.5 T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,437 kg3,168 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score54/100
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions211 g/km
- Best estimated range689 km428 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,437kg3,168lb | 1,519kg3,349lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,252mm167in | 4,266mm168in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,548mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 233L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 921L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has 10 hp more than Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,519 kg 3,349 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 7.1 s |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
Although Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has more power, Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 660 km 410 mi |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | 1,519 kg 3,349 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Is 82 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Has 10 hp more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























