Car comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAPvsVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe

3.0 dCi V6 FAP

235 hp2993 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012

Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010

2.5 T5 20V

230 hp2521 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP

Fastest top speed
250 km/h
155 mph Unrestricted
240 km/h
149 mph Restricted
Most powerful
235 hp
175 kW
Highest torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Best estimated range
880 km
547 mi
Largest trunk
423 L
Best overall score
55/100
Best performance score
57/100
Best economy score
87/100
Best practicality score
52/100

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.1 s
Lightest
1,519 kg
3,349 lb
Best power-to-weight
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power	235hp175kW	230hp172kW
Torque	450Nm332lb-ft	320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight	1,705kg3,759lb	1,519kg3,349lb
Gross weight	2,050kg4,519lb	1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated	235 km/h 146 mph
To 99% top speed	101.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated	87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.3s	7.1s
0-200 km/h	28.8s Calculated	30.7s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.9s Calculated	6.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK	9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK	13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.2s Calculated	15.1s Calculated
Power-to-weight	138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated	151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated	211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	880km547mi Calculated	689km428mi Calculated
Displacement	2,993cc183cu in	2,521cc154cu in
Length	4,643mm183in	4,266mm168in
Width	1,811mm71in	1,782mm70in
Height	1,400mm55in	1,447mm57in
Wheelbase	2,690mm106in	2,640mm104in
Front track	-	1,535mm60in
Rear track	-	1,531mm60in
Trunk volume	423L	278L
Max trunk volume	-	921L
Doors	2	3
Seats	4	4
Fuel tank	66L	62L
CO2 emissions	-	211g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAPVolvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	4,400 rpm	1,800 rpm	4,650 rpm
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	5,000 rpm	1,500-5,000 rpm	5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.9 s	6.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.3 s	7.1 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	28.8 s	30.7 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited	235 km/h 146 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	6.6 s	6.5 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.0 s	9.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.8 s	12.7 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.2 s	15.1 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	153 km/h 95 mph	152 km/h 95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	235 hp 175 kW
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	230 hp 172 kW

Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has 5 hp more than Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	450 Nm 332 lb-ft
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	320 Nm 236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	1,705 kg 3,759 lb
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	1,519 kg 3,349 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	235 km/h 146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	7.3 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	7.1 s

Although Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has more power, Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	880 km 547 mi
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	689 km 428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	235 hp 175 kW	7.3 s	Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	230 hp 172 kW	7.1 s	235 km/h 146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP

Power	235 hp 175 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	423 L 14.9 cu ft
Length	4,643 mm 182.8 in
Height	1,400 mm 55.1 in

VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V

Power	230 hp 172 kW
0-100 km/h	7.1 s
Top speed 235 km/h 146 mph

Doors/seats	3 doors 4 seats
Trunk	278 L 9.8 cu ft
Length	4,266 mm 168.0 in
Height	1,447 mm 57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP

Power	235 hp 175 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph

7.5 L/100 km

31.4 mpg US

37.7 mpg UK

VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V

Power	230 hp 172 kW
0-100 km/h	7.1 s
Top speed 235 km/h 146 mph

9.0 L/100 km

26.1 mpg US

31.4 mpg UK

Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK	7.3 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK	7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP	138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp	7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V	151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp	9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP

VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V

Power

235 hp

175 kW

230 hp

172 kW

Torque

450 Nm

332 lb-ft

320 Nm

236 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.3 s

7.1 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

250 km/h155 mph

Restricted

240 km/h149 mph

235 km/h

146 mph

Lightness

1,705 kg

3,759 lb

1,519 kg

3,349 lb

Fuel consumption

7.5 L/100 km

31.4 mpg US

37.7 mpg UK

9.0 L/100 km

26.1 mpg US

31.4 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	423 L 14.9 cu ft
Length	4,643 mm 182.8 in
Height	1,400 mm 55.1 in

Doors/seats	3 doors 4 seats
Trunk	278 L 9.8 cu ft
Length	4,266 mm 168.0 in
Height	1,447 mm 57.0 in

Range score

880 km

547 mi

689 km

428 mi

CO2 score

211 g/km

Trunk score

423 L

14.9 cu ft

278 L

9.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

138 hp/t

103 kW/t

7.3 kg/hp

151 hp/t

113 kW/t

6.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP	Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
Consumption	7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK	9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.13 LC100 km	15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.12 LC100 mi	25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal	1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,969 LC/year	2,363 LC/year