AUDI TT Coupe (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultravsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Largest trunk305 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score50/100
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,265kg2,789lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,177mm164in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,352mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 305L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | 712L | 700L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 16 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 7.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 422 km (262 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 69 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























