Car comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe

2.0 16V Turbo

205 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012
VS

Alfa Romeo Brera

2.4 JTDM

210 hp2387 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,029 km
    640 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Lightest
    1,503 kg
    3,314 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    423 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
205hp153kW
210hp157kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,503kg3,314lb
1,575kg3,472lb
Gross weight
1,923kg4,239lb
2,035kg4,486lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
97.5s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
33.7s
Calculated
36.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
1,029km640mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,387cc146cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,410mm174in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,400mm55in
1,341mm53in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,528mm100in
Front track-
1,579mm62in
Rear track-
1,559mm61in
Trunk volume
423L
300L
Max trunk volume-
610L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
66L
70L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDMPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.7 s
36.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
210 hp
157 kW

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM has 5 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
1,575 kg
3,472 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
236 km/h
147 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo7.8 s
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM7.9 s

Although Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM has more power, Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
825 km
513 mi
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
1,029 km
640 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
210 hp
157 kW
7.9 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboAlfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDM
Power
205 hp
153 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
1,029 km
640 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
423 L
14.9 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboAlfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 JTDM
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.4 JTDM
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.4 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera2.4 JTDMvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2.4 JTDM - car comparison - FastVsFaster