Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider

4.7 V8

450 hp4691 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedRoadster2008-2010
VS

Wiesmann Roadster MF4

4.4 V8

407 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2009-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    285 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    569 km
    354 mi
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph Unrestricted
    290 km/h
    180 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    450 hp
    336 kW
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
Power
450hp336kW
407hp304kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,455kg3,208lb
Gross weight
1,855kg4,090lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
291 km/h
181 mph
To 99% top speed
67.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
61.2s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
13.5s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
269hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
557km346mi
Calculated
569km354mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,691cc286cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,381mm172in
4,230mm167in
Width
1,892mm74in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,366mm54in
1,190mm47in
Wheelbase
2,645mm104in
2,507mm99in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,589mm63in
-
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
88L
70L
CO2 emissions
377g/km
285g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V87,000 rpm4,750 rpm7,500 rpm
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V85,500-6,400 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.5 s
13.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
291 km/h
181 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
119 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
450 hp
336 kW
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 has 43 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 43 hp (32 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
1,455 kg
3,208 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
291 km/h
181 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V84.4 s
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V84.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
269 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
557 km
346 mi
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
569 km
354 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
450 hp
336 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW
4.6 s
291 km/h
181 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,366 mm
53.8 in
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
4.4 s
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8
269 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
407 hp
304 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
291 km/h
181 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
Fuel consumption
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,366 mm
53.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Range score
557 km
346 mi
569 km
354 mi
CO2 score
377 g/km
285 g/km
Power-to-weight score
269 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
Consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.65 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.50 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,148 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8

  • Has 43 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 92 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.7 V8
4.7 V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20084.7 V8
4.7 V8
SL 600 V12
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2008SL 600 V12
4.4 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8
4.7 V8
6.0 i V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8
4.4 V8
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8vsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
4.7 V8
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2006AMG SL 55 V8
4.4 V8
Spyder 3.8
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8vsPorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8
4.7 V8
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8
4.4 V8
35is
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8vsBMWZ4 (E89)35is
4.7 V8
5.0 V10
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10
4.7 V8
Stingray 6.2 V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8
4.7 V8
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)AMG SL 55 V8
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 vs Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster