Wiesmann Roadster MF4
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
AMG SLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Most powerful421 hp314 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 58.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,507mm99in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 has 14 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 has more power, Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW | 4.6 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster MF44.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 4.4 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 90 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























