Alfa Romeo 8C Spider
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R171) · Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R171) · Facelift 2008
AMG SLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range583 km362 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 557km346mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,381mm172in | 4,103mm162in |
| Width | 1,892mm74in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,366mm54in | 1,271mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,645mm104in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 208L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 377g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 has 90 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 557 km 346 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 583 km 362 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 557 km 346 mi | 583 km 362 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 377 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 208 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.65 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,148 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Has 90 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























