Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder
Car comparison
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10vsAlfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 8C Spider
4.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful520 hp388 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight331 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score85/100
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions377 g/km
- Best estimated range557 km346 mi
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520hp388kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.8s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.8L/100 km9.5mpg US11.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated | 269hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 471km292mi Calculated | 557km346mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,961cc303cu in | 4,691cc286cu in |
| Length | 4,300mm169in | 4,381mm172in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,184mm47in | 1,366mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,560mm101in | 2,645mm104in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | 1,589mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 88L |
| CO2 emissions | 400g/km | 377g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 13.5 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10 has 70 hp more than Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 and Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 4.3 s |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10 and Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 and Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 471 km 292 mi |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 557 km 346 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 520 hp 388 kW | 4.3 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniGallardo Spyder5.0 V10 | Alfa Romeo8C Spider4.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp 388 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 471 km 292 mi | 557 km 346 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 400 g/km | 377 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 269 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10 | Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.75 LC100 km | 27.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,463 LC/year | 4,148 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 5.0 V10
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 8C Spider 4.7 V8
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























