Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164)

3.0 24V QV

232 hp2959 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1992-1998
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y33)

3.0T V6

270 hp2987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1995-1997

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    368 Nm
    271 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    172 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    798 km
    496 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
232hp173kW
270hp201kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
368Nm271lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,165kg4,773lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
798km496mi
Calculated
620km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
-
Width
1,760mm69in
-
Height
1,356mm53in
-
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
-
Front track
1,532mm60in
-
Rear track
1,506mm59in
-
Ground clearance-
145mm6in
Trunk volume
410L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV6,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
25.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
232 hp
173 kW
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has 38 hp more than Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV7.7 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V67.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
798 km
496 mi
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
620 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
232 hp
173 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW
7.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Power
232 hp
173 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,356 mm
53.4 in
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
Power
232 hp
173 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
232 hp
173 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,356 mm
53.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Range score
798 km
496 mi
620 km
385 mi
Trunk score
410 L
14.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV

  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 178 km (110 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 88 Nm more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 24V QV
2.5 i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsAlfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V
3.0T V6
2.5T
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsNissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
3.0 24V QV
185i V8
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsHSVClubsport (VR/VS)185i V8
3.0T V6
5.7 215i
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsHSVCaprice5.7 215i
3.0 24V QV
SHO 3.2 V6 24V5
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsFordTaurus IISHO 3.2 V6 24V5
3.0T V6
2.0 SSS-Z
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsNissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z
3.0 24V QV
2.2i Turbo 20V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsAUDIS22.2i Turbo 20V
3.0T V6
740i
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsBMW7 Series (E38)740i
3.0 24V QV
3.2i 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsHondaLegend II (KA7)3.2i 24V
3.0T V6
4.2 V8 32V
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsAUDIA8 (D2/4D)4.2 V8 32V
3.0 24V QV
2.8 V6 30V
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsAUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V
3.0 24V QV
300
VS
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QVvsLexusGS I300
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV vs Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster