Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QVvsLexus GS I 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus GS I
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful232 hp173 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lexus GS I 300
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | LexusGS I300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 232hp173kW | 208hp155kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 275Nm203lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 160Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,965mm195in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,356mm53in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 404L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: Power / Torque
- Lexus GS I 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| LexusGS I300 | 5,800 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | LexusGS I300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW |
| LexusGS I300 | 208 hp 155 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV has 24 hp more than Lexus GS I 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus GS I 300 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| LexusGS I300 | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| LexusGS I300 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LexusGS I300 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 7.7 s |
| LexusGS I300 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Lexus GS I 300: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| LexusGS I300 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV and Lexus GS I 300: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| LexusGS I300 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 798 km 496 mi |
| LexusGS I300 | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 232 hp 173 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LexusGS I300 | 208 hp 155 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusGS I300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusGS I300 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| LexusGS I300 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| LexusGS I300 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V QV | LexusGS I300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 232 hp 173 kW | 208 hp 155 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV | Lexus GS I 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V QV
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lexus GS I 300
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























