Alfa Romeo 147 GTA
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6vsOpel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOpel Astra H
2.0i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 74.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,213mm166in | 4,249mm167in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,753mm69in |
| Height | 1,412mm56in | 1,467mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,546mm100in | 2,614mm103in |
| Front track | 1,516mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,504mm59in | 1,488mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,030L | 1,330L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 287g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 5,600 rpm | - | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 has 10 hp more than Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 and Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 521 km 324 mi |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 287 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 | Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























