Car comparison

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II)

3.0i V6 24V

254 hp2946 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2005
VS

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA

3.2 V6

250 hp3179 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.6 L/100 km
    15.1 mpg US
    18.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    285 g/km
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6

  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    184 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    521 km
    324 mi
  • Largest trunk
    280 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    64/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,360kg2,998lb
Gross weight
1,610kg3,549lb
1,880kg4,145lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
71.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
21.3s
Calculated
23.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
513km319mi
Calculated
521km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
3,179cc194cu in
Length
3,841mm151in
4,213mm166in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,764mm69in
Height
1,351mm53in
1,412mm56in
Wheelbase
2,532mm100in
2,546mm100in
Front track
1,518mm60in
1,516mm60in
Rear track
1,470mm58in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume
45L
280L
Max trunk volume
67L
1,030L
Doors
2
3
Seats
2
5
Fuel tank
61L
63L
CO2 emissions
285g/km
287g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V7,150 rpm4,650 rpm7,400 rpm
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V66,200 rpm4,800 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.3 s
23.2 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
163 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
254 hp
189 kW
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
1,360 kg
2,998 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
246 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V5.8 s
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V66.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
513 km
319 mi
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
521 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
254 hp
189 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
6.3 s
246 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
45 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
3,841 mm
151.2 in
Height
1,351 mm
53.2 in
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,213 mm
165.9 in
Height
1,412 mm
55.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.3 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
45 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
3,841 mm
151.2 in
Height
1,351 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,213 mm
165.9 in
Height
1,412 mm
55.6 in
Range score
513 km
319 mi
521 km
324 mi
CO2 score
285 g/km
287 g/km
Trunk score
45 L
1.6 cu ft
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km21.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi34.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,176 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6

  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 235 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0i V6 24V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
3.2 V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 (8P)3.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)3.2i V6 24V
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
1.750 TBi
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.750 TBi
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2 V6
R32 3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsVolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.2 V6
R32 3.2 V6
VS
Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6vsVolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V vs Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster