Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VvsRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 513km319mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,841mm151in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,351mm53in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,532mm100in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,518mm60in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 45L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 67L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 7,150 rpm | 4,650 rpm | 7,400 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 254 hp 189 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V has 30 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V and Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 513 km 319 mi |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 513 km 319 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 45 L 1.6 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
- Emits 76 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























