Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 147 GTA
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk280 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,569kg3,459lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,246mm167in | 4,213mm166in |
| Width | 1,759mm69in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,412mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,546mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,516mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,504mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,230L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 287g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 6.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 612 km 380 mi |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 521 km 324 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.2 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 287 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf V (5-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.2 V6
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























