Opel Astra H
Car comparison
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V TurbovsRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,249mm167in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,753mm69in | - |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,614mm103in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,488mm59in | 1,521mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,330L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 5,600 rpm | - | 5,850 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.2 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo has 16 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 6.4 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo and Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 565 km 351 mi |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























