Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 TvsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 273hp204kW |
| Torque | 383Nm282lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,455mm175in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 454L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 280 hp 209 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T has 7 hp more than Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 6.1 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
Although Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T has more power, Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 273 hp 204 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























