AC Ace
Car comparison
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V TurbovsBMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series Convertible (E64)
645Ci
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score68/100
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption18.5 L/100 km12.7 mpg US15.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 87.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s Calculated | 22.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,506cc214cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,420mm174in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,592mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 22.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW |
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo has 21 hp more than BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci and AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 5.5 s |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACAce3.5 i V8 32V Turbo | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Ace 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Has 43 Nm more
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























