Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAbarth Pulse 1.3 T270

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Abarth Pulse

1.3 T270

180 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAbarthPulse1.3 T270
Power
200hp149kW
180hp134kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
1,281kg2,824lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
1,681kg3,706lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
38.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,332cc81cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,115mm162in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,777mm70in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,544mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,532mm100in
Front track-
1,484mm58in
Rear track-
1,510mm59in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
188mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
370L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostAbarth Pulse 1.3 T270PowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
AbarthPulse1.3 T2705,750 rpm1,750 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAbarthPulse1.3 T270
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
38.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
180 hp
134 kW

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has 20 hp more than Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270.

The biggest power difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
1,281 kg
2,824 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
AbarthPulse1.3 T2707.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
180 hp
134 kW
7.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAbarthPulse1.3 T270
Power
200 hp
149 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
1,281 kg
2,824 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 86 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270

  • Is 77 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 T270
1.5T
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsChevroletSeeker1.5T
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1.3 T270
Cooper S 2.0
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.3 T270
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
1.3 T270
2.0 TSI
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.3 T270
GLA 220d
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
1.3 T270
1.6 PureTech
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 - car comparison - FastVsFaster