Abarth 695
Car comparison
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest997 kg2,198 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range783 km487 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 997kg2,198lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,095kg2,414lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 783km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,647mm65in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,429mm56in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,422mm56in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 997 kg 2,198 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5.9 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 574 km 357 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 997 kg 2,198 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 783 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 308 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 210 km (130 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























