Abarth 695
Car comparison
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest997 kg2,198 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 997kg2,198lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,095kg2,414lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 1,170km727mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,647mm65in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,429mm56in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,422mm56in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,060L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 997 kg 2,198 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 574 km 357 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,170 km 727 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 997 kg 2,198 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 1,170 km 727 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 393 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 596 km (371 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























