Car comparison

Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Abarth 695

Biposto 1.4 T-Jet

190 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016
VS

Mini Hatch (F56)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    815 km
    506 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    997 kg
    2,198 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    191 hp/t
    142 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAbarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
997kg2,198lb
1,175kg2,590lb
Gross weight
1,095kg2,414lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
61.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
69.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
574km357mi
Calculated
815km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,368cc83cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
3,657mm144in
3,850mm152in
Width
1,647mm65in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,485mm58in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,300mm91in
2,495mm98in
Front track
1,429mm56in
1,485mm58in
Rear track
1,422mm56in
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume-
211L
Doors
3
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
35L
44L
CO2 emissions
145g/km
125g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet5,750 rpm2,500 rpm6,000 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAbarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
26.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
190 hp
142 kW
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet.

The biggest power difference is between Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
997 kg
2,198 lb
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1,175 kg
2,590 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet5.9 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.06.7 s

Although Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 has more power, Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
574 km
357 mi
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
815 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
190 hp
142 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.7 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,657 mm
144.0 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAbarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
997 kg
2,198 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,657 mm
144.0 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
574 km
357 mi
815 km
506 mi
CO2 score
145 g/km
125 g/km
Trunk score
-
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAbarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet

  • Is 178 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth5951.4 T-Jet
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
GTI 1.8 TSI
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsVolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
1.8 TFSI
VS
Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAUDIA1 (8X)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster