Abarth 695
Car comparison
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest997 kg2,198 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range574 km357 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 997kg2,198lb | 1,035kg2,282lb |
| Gross weight | 1,095kg2,414lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 34.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 538km335mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,647mm65in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,429mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,422mm56in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | - | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 34.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet has 30 hp more than Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 997 kg 2,198 lb |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 5.9 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 574 km 357 mi |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 538 km 335 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 190 hp 142 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth695Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 997 kg 2,198 lb | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 538 km 335 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 695 Biposto 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























