Abarth 595
Car comparison
Abarth 595 1.4 T-JetvsAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013
1.4 TP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,035 kg2,282 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,035kg2,282lb | 1,170kg2,579lb |
| Gross weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 538km335mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,511mm99in |
| Front track | 1,409mm55in | 1,483mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,402mm55in | 1,475mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW |
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP has 10 hp more than Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 538 km 335 mi |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 538 km 335 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet | Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 295 km (183 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























