Land Rover Range Rover Sport I · Facelift 2009
5.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3)
724 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2009-2013
0-100 km/h 5.0 s
Top speed
259 km/h
161 mph
Performance
| Power | 724hp540kW+214 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 906Nm668lb-ft+281 Nm |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Curb weight | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Gross weight | 3,125kg6,889lb |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s-1.2 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s-9.3 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s-1.1 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s-1.3 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.0s99% target: 256 km/h / 159 mph-15.2 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel consumption city | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel tank | 88L |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated |
| CO2 emissions | 348g/km |
Engine and drivetrain
| Engine | 508PS |
|---|---|
| Body type | SUV |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Aspiration | Supercharged |
| Drive type | AWD |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Gears | 6-speed |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine configuration | V-engine |
| Cylinders | 8 |
| Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Dimensions and space
| Length | 4,783mm188in |
|---|---|
| Height | 1,789mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 227mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 958L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,013L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IFacelift 20095.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) | 724 hp 540 kW |
| Database median | 261 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IFacelift 20095.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) | 5.0 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IFacelift 20095.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IFacelift 20095.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport I Facelift 2009 5.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport I Facelift 2009 5.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3)PowerTorque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport I Facelift 2009 5.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IFacelift 20095.0 LR V8 Supercharged (Stage 3) | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport I 5.0 LR V8 Supercharged
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12