324 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
0-100 km/h 6.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Performance
| Power | 204 hp / Stage 2: 275 hp240 hp / Stage 2: 324 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft+200 Nm |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s-1.3 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s-13.2 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s-1.2 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s-1.1 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-9.6 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 65L |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km |
Engine and drivetrain
Dimensions and space
| Length | 4,371mm172in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 591L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,383L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) | 324 hp 242 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) | 6.4 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2)PowerTorque
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 Sd4 (Stage 2) | 2,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 Sd4
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12