275 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
0-100 km/h 7.1 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Performance
| Power | 204 hp / Stage 2: 275 hp240 hp / Stage 2: 324 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 602Nm444lb-ft+172 Nm |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s-1.5 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s-21.2 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s-1.3 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s-1.1 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph-10.2 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 65L |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
Engine and drivetrain
Dimensions and space
| Length | 4,371mm172in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 591L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,383L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 D200 (Stage 2) | 275 hp 205 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 D200 (Stage 2) | 7.1 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 D200 (Stage 2) | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 D200 (Stage 2) | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 D200 (Stage 2) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 D200 (Stage 2)PowerTorque
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 D200 (Stage 2): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque II2.0 D200 (Stage 2) | 3,750 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque II 2.0 D200
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12