203 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
0-100 km/h 8.7 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Performance
| Power | 203 hp240 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Curb weight | 1,564kg3,448lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.1s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel tank | 63L |
| Estimated range | 856km532mi Calculated |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km |
Engine and drivetrain
Dimensions and space
| Length | 4,871mm192in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 458L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,356L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMondeo IV Hatchback2.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMondeo IV Hatchback2.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMondeo IV Hatchback2.0 EcoBoost | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMondeo IV Hatchback2.0 EcoBoost | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mondeo IV Hatchback 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Ford Mondeo IV Hatchback 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
- Ford Mondeo IV Hatchback 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMondeo IV Hatchback2.0 EcoBoost | 5,300 rpm | 2,700-3,500 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Mondeo IV Hatchback 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12