Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest2,078 kg4,581 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions186 g/km
- Best estimated range888 km551 mi
- Largest trunk368 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW+160 hp | 416hp310kW+96 hp | 378hp282kW+58 hp | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-18.6 s Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-12.5 s Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s-1.5 s | 5.5s-1.0 s | 5.9s-0.6 s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s-10.5 s Calculated | 19.9s-7.4 s Calculated | 22.6s-4.7 s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.2s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 888km551mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 368L | 368L | 368L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 186g/km | 186g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 416 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 378 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 320 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 19.9 s | 22.6 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.5 s | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s | 14.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 480 hp 358 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 416 hp 310 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 378 hp 282 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 320 hp 239 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp has 160 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 320 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 320 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp: 160 hp (119 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 320 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 416 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 378 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 888 km 551 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 888 km 551 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 888 km 551 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 888 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 480 hp 358 kW | 5.0 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.5 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 378 hp 282 kW | 5.9 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)480 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)416 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)378 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6320 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | 378 hp 282 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 888 km 551 mi | 888 km 551 mi | 888 km 551 mi | 888 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 416 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 378 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 320 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 480 hp
- Has 64 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 416 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























