Maserati Levante
Car comparison
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDIvsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed251 km/h156 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Lightest2,078 kg4,581 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions186 g/km
- Best estimated range888 km551 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,109kg4,650lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.5s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 748km465mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,003mm197in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,968mm77in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,679mm66in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,004mm118in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 249g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 5,750 rpm | 4,500-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.5 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 350 hp 261 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI has 30 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 6.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 748 km 465 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 888 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 350 hp 261 kW | 6.0 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 748 km 465 mi | 888 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 249 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Levante 3.0 V6 GDI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 63 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























