Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions186 g/km
- Best estimated range888 km551 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km449mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,681mm184in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 has 20 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 5.4 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 722 km 449 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 888 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.4 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 V6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 449 mi | 888 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 213 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 165 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























