Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,977 kg4,359 lb
- Best power-to-weight190 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW+125 hp | 325hp242kW+75 hp | 295hp220kW+45 hp | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,977kg4,359lb | 1,977kg4,359lb | 1,977kg4,359lb | 1,977kg4,359lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-15.9 s Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph-10.2 s Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph-6.7 s Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s-1.5 s | 5.8s-1.0 s | 6.1s-0.7 s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s-12.3 s Calculated | 22.0s-8.9 s Calculated | 24.9s-6.0 s Calculated | 30.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.5s-1.0 s Calculated | 5.8s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 22.0 s | 24.9 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.7 s | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.9 s | 14.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp has 125 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 190 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 779 km 484 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 779 km 484 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 779 km 484 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW | 5.3 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.8 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 190 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb | 1,977 kg 4,359 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 779 km 484 mi | 779 km 484 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























