Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lightest1,958 kg4,317 lb
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 1,958kg4,317lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.2s Calculated | 67.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 368L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.2 s | 67.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has 35 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,958 kg 4,317 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 1,958 kg 4,317 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,224 km 761 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 137 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























