Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2d

180 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,604 kg
    3,536 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    112 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    124 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,234 km
    767 mi
  • Largest trunk
    525 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,604kg3,536lb
1,958kg4,317lb
Gross weight-
2,450kg5,401lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
78.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
47.8s
Calculated
67.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,234km767mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,687mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,613mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,653mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
525L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
60L
CO2 emissions
124g/km
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.8 s
67.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
90 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,604 kg
3,536 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,958 kg
4,317 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d7.6 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
1,234 km
767 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
180 hp
134 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,604 kg
3,536 lb
1,958 kg
4,317 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
525 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,234 km
767 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
124 g/km
153 g/km
Trunk score
525 L
18.5 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 354 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 29 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.2d
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.2d
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.2d
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2dvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster