BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,958kg4,317lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 67.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 67.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,958 kg 4,317 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,958 kg 4,317 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Is 458 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























