AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,234 km767 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,604kg3,536lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | - |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 78.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 47.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 914km568mi Calculated | 1,234km767mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,388mm173in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,365L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 47.8 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 914 km 568 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 1,234 km 767 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,604 kg 3,536 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 914 km 568 mi | 1,234 km 767 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI
- Is 64 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 320 km (199 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























