Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC40
2.0 T4 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best estimated range818 km508 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW+95 hp | 247hp184kW+57 hp | 224hp167kW+34 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm | 405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm | 366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,647kg3,631lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph-12.9 s Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph-8.5 s Calculated | 83.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph-5.2 s Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s-1.9 s | 7.1s-1.3 s | 7.6s-0.8 s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s-28.1 s Calculated | 32.0s-21.8 s Calculated | 37.7s-16.1 s Calculated | 53.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.8s-1.2 s Calculated | 7.2s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s-1.5 s Calculated | 15.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,863mm73in | 1,863mm73in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,702mm106in | 2,702mm106in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L | 460L | 460L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 54L | 54L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 154g/km | 154g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 32.0 s | 37.7 s | 53.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp has 95 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 190 hp and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 190 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.6 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 3)285 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 2)247 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4 (Stage 1)224 hp | VolvoXC402.0 T4190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 818 km 508 mi | 818 km 508 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 154 g/km | 154 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 1) 224 hp | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 (Stage 2) 247 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























