Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D5vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score92/100
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Lightest1,932 kg4,259 lb
- Best estimated range1,094 km680 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,996kg4,400lb | 1,932kg4,259lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 58.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,094km680mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 58.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D5 has 20 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,094 km 680 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,094 km 680 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D5 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Is 64 kg lighter
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























