Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25dvsVolvo V90 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,800 kg3,968 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,082 km672 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,996kg4,400lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,082km672mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,955mm195in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,496mm59in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d has 5 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 7.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 1,082 km 672 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.0 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d | VolvoV902.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,082 km 672 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d | Volvo V90 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 25d
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























