Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,624 kg3,580 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 213hp159kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,624kg3,580lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.1s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 704km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 335L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.1 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 2 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 213 hp 159 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 704 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (228 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Is 61 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























