Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 5 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























