Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsVolvo S90 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Volvo S90

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,561 kg
    3,441 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,731 km
    1,075 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,561kg3,441lb
1,866kg4,114lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
27.2s
Calculated
29.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,731km1,075mi
Calculated
1,170km727mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,963mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,941mm116in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
152mm6in
Trunk volume
380L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
55L
CO2 emissions-
123g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Volvo S90 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
VolvoS902.0 D44,250 rpm-5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4VolvoS902.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.2 s
29.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoS902.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,866 kg
4,114 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS902.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.6 s
VolvoS902.0 D48.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,731 km
1,075 mi
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,170 km
727 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
1,866 kg
4,114 lb
Fuel consumption
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,731 km
1,075 mi
1,170 km
727 mi
CO2 score
-
123 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Volvo S90 2.0 D4
Consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.83 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.98 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used585 L155 US gal129 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,024 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Is 305 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 561 km (348 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volvo S90 2.0 D4

  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Volvo S90 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster