Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4vsVolvo S90 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

1.6 T4

180 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015
VS

Volvo S90

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Lightest
    1,495 kg
    3,296 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,164 km
    723 mi
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Volvo S90 2.0 T4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4VolvoS902.0 T4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,831kg4,037lb
Gross weight
2,020kg4,453lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
35.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,164km723mi
Calculated
821km510mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,596cc97cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,963mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,941mm116in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
152mm6in
Trunk volume
380L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
55L
CO2 emissions-
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4Volvo S90 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T45,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,150 rpm
VolvoS902.0 T45,000 rpm1,700-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4VolvoS902.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
35.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoS902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolvoS902.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
VolvoS902.0 T4
1,831 kg
4,037 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoS902.0 T4
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T48.3 s
VolvoS902.0 T48.7 s

Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T4
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
VolvoS902.0 T4
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,164 km
723 mi
VolvoS902.0 T4
821 km
510 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoS902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
VolvoS902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.3 s
VolvoS902.0 T4
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoS902.0 T4
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4VolvoS902.0 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,831 kg
4,037 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,164 km
723 mi
821 km
510 mi
CO2 score
-
155 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4Volvo S90 2.0 T4
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Is 336 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 343 km (213 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo S90 2.0 T4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 1.6 T4
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1.6 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 T4
20d
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsJaguarXF (X260)20d
1.6 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0 T4
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsRenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
1.6 T4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.0 T4
D180
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
1.6 T4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
1.6 T4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 T4
C 200
VS
VolvoS902.0 T4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 vs Volvo S90 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster