Volvo S70
Car comparison
Volvo S70 2.3 TurbovsVolvo S40 II 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Lightest1,403 kg3,093 lb
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,473kg3,247lb | 1,403kg3,093lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo has 30 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 and Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6.7 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Volvo S40 II 2.5: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 66 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Is 70 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























