Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,787 kg3,940 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range983 km611 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,843kg4,063lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 82.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 983km611mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,656mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,578mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 27 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 983 km 611 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 983 km 611 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 214 km (133 mi) more estimated range
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























