Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Is 367 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























